Extended thromboprophylaxis
Healthcare Improvement Scotland has assessed this shared decision aid against the following quality criteria. The quality criteria are based on national and international standards for shared decision aids.
|
Criterion |
Assessment |
More information |
|
Process |
|
|
|
1. Has information available about the updating policy. |
Met |
The patient decision aid will be updated in an ongoing fashion by authors based on changes in studies published and feedback provided by users. |
|
2. Provides an indication that the shared decision aid is underpinned by evidence. |
Met |
references for benefits and harms section |
|
3. Provides information about the levels of uncertainty around event or outcome probabilities, e.g. by giving a range or by using phases such as ‘our best estimate is. |
Partially Met |
|
|
4. An equality impact assessment has been carried out to identify impact on inequalities groups. |
No Info |
|
|
Content |
|
|
|
1. Provides a production or publication date. |
Met |
Feb 2022 |
|
2. Provides information about country of publication. |
Met |
Canada |
|
3. Describes the health condition or issue for which the decision is required. |
Met |
what is a blood clot - what is a blood thinner |
|
4. States the decision that needs to be considered. |
Met |
what are your options section |
|
5. Provides clear information about the potential consequences, benefits and harms of each option. |
Met |
|
|
6. Displays and frames options in a consistent, balanced and impartial way - for example, using the same sized font and neutral language. |
Partially met |
Suggest the term 'decline' is not neutral language - some questions seem biased towards intervention eg How important is it to you to avoid major bleeding that could result in death? |
|
7. Uses everyday language that is widely understood, or simpler language where necessary. |
Not met (reading age over 14 for aid to be explained by HCP) |
Your direct input has an average reading ease of about 56.2 of 100. It should be easily understood by 17 to 18 year olds.Readability level 8.7 Flesch-KIncaid |
|
8. Shows that effort has been made to present quantitative information about risks, benefits, chance and uncertainty in a way that is understandable to people with low levels of numeracy. |
Not met |
Not well explained eg , ~0.28 more will avoid dying from a blood clot |
|
9. Is presented in a digital format that complies with accessibility standards. |
Not met |
|